Beyond anthropology to post-anthropology : (Record no. 8976)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02199cam a22001935i 4500
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
ISBN 9789383803736
082 ## - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER
Classification number 301
Item number BAO-B
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--AUTHOR NAME
Personal name Baofu, Peter,
Relator term author.
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Beyond anthropology to post-anthropology :
Sub Title towards a new theory of centrality and peripherality in the post-human future /
Statement of responsibility, etc Peter Baofu.
250 ## - EDITION STATEMENT
Edition statement First edition.
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication New Delhi
Name of publisher Overseas Press India Pvt. Ltd.
Year of publication 2017
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Number of Pages 2 volumes (xxxiii, 799 pages) ;
Other physical details
440 ## - SERIES STATEMENT/ADDED ENTRY--TITLE
Title 2 Volumes
504 ## - BIBLIOGRAPHY, ETC. NOTE
Bibliography, etc Includes bibliographical references (pages 731-755) and index.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc Is anthropology really so heterophilic that, as Ruth Benedict once suggested, “the purpose of anthropology is to make the world safe for human differences” (BQ 2017) This positive view on anthropology can be contrasted with the opposing one by Nancy B. Smith, who observed instead that “anthropology is the science which tells us that people are the same the whole world over―except when they are different”? (BQ 2017a) Contrary to these opposing views (and other ones as will be discussed in the book), anthropology (in relation to centrality and peripherality—as well as other dichotomies) is neither possible (or impossible) nor desirable (or undesirable) to the extent that the respective ideologues (on different sides) would like us to believe, such that there is no centrality without peripherality (and vice versa), to be explained by the “symmetry-asymmetry principle” (and other ones) in “existential dialectics” (in Chapter Four). Needless to say, this challenge to the conventional debate does not mean that anthropology is worthless, or that those diverse fields (related to anthropology)—such as sociology, cultural studies, religion, criminology, jurisprudence, medicine, science studies, biology, linguistics, philosophy, economics, political science, cosmology, psychology, social studies, history, literature, ecology, the arts, communication studies, technology studies, and so on—should be rejected. (WK 2017) Of course, neither of these extreme views is reasonable.
546 ## - LANGUAGE NOTE
Language note English
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical Term Anthropology
General subdivision Philosophy.
Form subdivision Peripherality and Society
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme
Koha item type Books
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Permanent Location Current Location Date acquired Source of acquisition Serial Enumeration / chronology Bill Date Full call number Accession Number Price effective from Koha item type Cost, normal purchase price Cost, replacement price
        NASSDOC Library NASSDOC Library 2017-06-19 Gifted by : Overseas Press Vol 1 2017-05-26 301 BAO-B; Vol 1 49262 2019-04-18 Books    
        NASSDOC Library NASSDOC Library 2017-06-19 Gifted by : Overseas Press Vol 2 2017-05-26 301 BAO-B; Vol 2 49263 2019-04-18 Books    
        NASSDOC Library NASSDOC Library 2024-03-21 Overseas Press Pvt LTD Vol 1 2024-03-20 301 BAO-B; Vol-1 54276 2024-03-20 Books 1442.19 1997.50
        NASSDOC Library NASSDOC Library 2024-03-21 Overseas Press Pvt LTD Vol 2 2024-03-20 301 BAO-B; Vol-2 54277 2024-03-20 Books 1442.19 1997.50