Economic analysis of tort law : the negligence determination
By: Pal, Malabika.
Publisher: New York Routledge 2020Edition: South Asia.Description: vii,224p.ISBN: 9780367898243.Subject(s): Negligence--Economic aspects -- Torts--Economic aspects -- Negligence--Cases -- United States -- Great Britain -- IndiaDDC classification: 346.03 Summary: This book looks at the negligence concept of tort law and studies the efficiency issue arising from the determination of negligence. It does so by scrutinizing actual court decisions from three common law jurisdictions - Britain, India and the United States of America. This volume fills a very significant gap, scrutinizing 52 landmark judgments from these three countries, by focussing on the negligent affliction of economic loss determined by common law courts and how these findings relate to the existing theoretical literature. By doing so, it examines the formalization of legal concepts, in theory, primarily the question of negligence determination and liability, and their centrality in theories concerning tort law.| Item type | Current location | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Books
|
NASSDOC Library | 346.03 PAL-E (Browse shelf) | Available | 50915 |
Browsing NASSDOC Library Shelves Close shelf browser
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
| 346.01660954 SAX-D Divorce and democracy : | 346.0168 CHA-P Public Practice, Private Law | 346.017 BAL-I Evolution of minimum wage policy and regulatory framework: an inter country pers | 346.03 PAL-E Economic analysis of tort law | 346.04 GER-P Property Law and social Morality | 346.04 ROU- The Routledge handbook of property, law, and society / | 346.04 SEX-N New Dimensions of Intellectual Property Right / |
Include Bibliography and Index
This book looks at the negligence concept of tort law and studies the efficiency issue arising from the determination of negligence. It does so by scrutinizing actual court decisions from three common law jurisdictions - Britain, India and the United States of America. This volume fills a very significant gap, scrutinizing 52 landmark judgments from these three countries, by focussing on the negligent affliction of economic loss determined by common law courts and how these findings relate to the existing theoretical literature. By doing so, it examines the formalization of legal concepts, in theory, primarily the question of negligence determination and liability, and their centrality in theories concerning tort law.
There are no comments for this item.